AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

Here’s a simple, high‑leverage north‑star for AI‑coding work: merged PRs per agent‑hour — how many pull requests successfully land on main per hour of agent runtime.


Why this metric

  • Outcome‑centric: measures shipped code, not tokens, prompts, or “attempts.”
  • Comparable: normalizes across models, repos, and workflows with a single denominator (agent hours).
  • Anti‑vanity: ignores drafts, abandoned PRs, and reverts so the number reflects real value.

Exact definition

  • Numerator: Count of PRs merged to main in the window, excluding drafts, auto‑reverts, and PRs that are reverted within 7 days.
  • Denominator: Sum of wall‑clock runtime hours for all agents involved in those PRs (planning + coding + refactor + test + review assistance).
  • Metric: Merged PRs per agent‑hour = valid_merged_prs / agent_runtime_hours

Guardrails (make it hard to game)

  • Only count PRs with: green CI, at least 1 human approval, and non‑trivial diff (e.g., ≥ 15 changed LOC or at least 2 files).
  • Exclude PRs labeled chore/deps unless they include passing tests written/updated by the agent.
  • Track a 7‑day revert rate alongside the metric. If revert rate > 5%, pause experiments.

Minimal implementation (7 steps)

  1. Tag agent runs: log run_id, start/stop timestamps, repo, branch, PR number.
  2. Join with VCS: from GitHub/GitLab API pull merged_at, is_draft, labels, CI status, approvals, reverts.
  3. Filter valid PRs: apply the rules above.
  4. Aggregate runtime: sum agent run hours per PR (if multiple runs touch one PR, sum them).
  5. Compute core metric daily + weekly; add p50/p90 time‑to‑merge and tests‑added per PR as secondary.
  6. Slice: by repo, model, prompt pack, retrieval config, and reviewer to find winners.
  7. Alerting: if metric drops >20% WoW or revert rate spikes, notify in Slack.

Example SQL (BigQuery‑style, adapt as needed)

WITH agent_runs AS (
  SELECT pr_number, SUM(TIMESTAMP_DIFF(ended_at, started_at, MINUTE))/60.0 AS agent_hours
  FROM runs
  WHERE started_at >= @from AND ended_at < @to
  GROUP BY pr_number
),
valid_prs AS (
  SELECT p.pr_number
  FROM prs p
  LEFT JOIN reverts r ON r.reverted_pr = p.pr_number AND r.created_at BETWEEN p.merged_at AND TIMESTAMP_ADD(p.merged_at, INTERVAL 7 DAY)
  WHERE p.base_branch = 'main'
    AND p.is_draft = FALSE
    AND p.merged_at BETWEEN @from AND @to
    AND p.ci_status = 'success'
    AND p.approvals_count >= 1
    AND p.changed_loc >= 15
    AND (r.reverted_pr IS NULL)
    AND NOT ARRAY_TO_STRING(p.labels, ',') LIKE '%chore/deps%'
)
SELECT
  COUNT(v.pr_number) / NULLIF(SUM(a.agent_hours), 0) AS merged_prs_per_agent_hour,
  COUNT(v.pr_number) AS merged_prs,
  SUM(a.agent_hours) AS agent_hours
FROM valid_prs v
JOIN agent_runs a USING (pr_number);

Dashboard (keep it tiny)

  • Top‑line: Merged PRs / agent‑hour (7d, 28d)
  • Quality rails: Revert rate (7d), CI pass‑on‑first‑try %
  • Speed: p50/p90 time‑to‑merge
  • Breakdowns: by model → by repo → by task type
  • Leaderboard: prompt pack / tool config by uplift vs. baseline

How to use it weekly

  • Ship two changes at a time (model + prompt = too many confounders).
  • Hold a 20‑minute review: if a variant improves the metric and keeps revert rate low, promote it; otherwise roll back.

Open and Async: The collaborative software development playbook for remote and distributed teams

Open and Async: The collaborative software development playbook for remote and distributed teams

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

Networking for AI Clusters: 400g/800g, Infiniband Vs Ethernet

Networking for AI clusters—comparing 400G/800G, Infiniband, and Ethernet—offers insights into optimizing performance for future demanding workloads.

Why Every AI-Enabled Agency Needs Human-Review Tracking Software

A new workflow tracker for AI-assisted agencies improves task visibility and quality control by tracking human and AI work, addressing a critical gap.

Intel Introduces ‘Crescent Island’ Inference GPU

AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).Executive SummaryIntel’s…

The Regulatory Vacuum.

Google disclosed a zero-day vulnerability on May 11, 2026, revealing an AI-driven attack, but regulatory frameworks remain absent, raising security concerns.